Great post. This point is almost comical: “The ultraprocessed food debate has become increasingly polarized, with methodological critique often dismissed through rhetorical rather than scientific means.” I think many of the anti-UPF people are guilty of this, using tactics like zooming in on a singular edge case to “disprove” the entire concept, or acting like the incorporation of commercial determinants is somehow non-scientific.
Great post. This point is almost comical: “The ultraprocessed food debate has become increasingly polarized, with methodological critique often dismissed through rhetorical rather than scientific means.” I think many of the anti-UPF people are guilty of this, using tactics like zooming in on a singular edge case to “disprove” the entire concept, or acting like the incorporation of commercial determinants is somehow non-scientific.
Thanks Lindsey...absolutely!